In a report published by New Climate Economy “Better Growth, Better Climate”, it estimated that from 2015-30, the projected global demand required for infrastructure would be $89 trillion. An additional $8.8 trillion of investment in low carbon technology and energy efficiency is required to meet the 2°C goal of the 2015 Paris Accord. If we assume that projected demand is met with 75 per cent debt, infrastructure debt represents nearly a $75 trillion-dollar opportunity. Within this enormous demand, McKinsey define sustainable infrastructure as any infrastructure asset that is socially inclusive, low carbon and climate resilient.
There are several characteristics of infrastructure debt which make it an appealing asset class for investors seeking opportunities to make a positive contribution to the environment. These include the size of the opportunity, visibility of the use of proceeds, measurement of impacts and the ability to incorporate ESG factors in risk management.
ESG and sustainability in the investment process
Understanding the ESG and sustainability profile of investments and their relationship to fiduciary duties is becoming increasingly topical, not least prompted by the EC Action Plan on Sustainable Finance and the IORP II Directive in Europe. Sustainability-oriented investors look for projects with:
- direct visibility on the use of proceeds,
- access to due diligence reports on salient ESG issues,
- ongoing transparency and reporting on nonfinancial elements of project operations, and the opportunity to negotiate directly with the borrower,
- detailed information including due diligence reports on a range of ESG risks and identify positive ESG outcomes.
It is important that lenders have ongoing engagement and dialogue with asset owners throughout the investment lifecycle. There will undoubtedly be developments in ESG considerations as the knowledge and understanding of these factors by investors and operators matures. In the context of long dated loans, managers need to make sure that they have terms in the loan agreements which provides reporting to investors and the rights to take action when necessary. This is enhanced by close relationships with the borrower and with sponsors.
The importance of measurement
The ability to measure sustainability performance is considerable as both measurement and taxonomy are high on the agenda of regulators seeking to enable investment in combating climate change. This is important as there are challenges relating to accepted definitions, consistency and comparability of standards.
There is no shortage of frameworks for assessing the sustainability qualities and risks associated with investments. From the Green Bond and Green Loan Principles, UN SDGs, and recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), to Impact Management Project (IMP) and GIIN’s IRIS, these frameworks each offer something different and are often complementary. Perhaps the most recognisable of these, the SDGs has been increasing in popularity with managers as a way of targeting sustainable investments and tracking nonfinancial impacts. Macquarie’s Green Investment Group (GIG) also offer a proprietary Green Impact Reporting service to demonstrate how climate investments are aligned with decarbonisation objectives and SDGs. The approach is based on the harmonised carbon accounting framework developed in partnership with development banks including International Finance Corporation (IFC), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and the European Investment Bank (EIB).
Our role as an asset manager
The impact of climate change is one of the world’s greatest challenges. Infrastructure debt has an important role to play in meeting the investment requirements. Private capital is able to finance a range of sustainability subsectors including renewable energy generation, energy efficiency, storage, water, housing and electric vehicles to name a few. The asset class can provide investors with access to attractive risk-adjusted returns while meeting their sustainability investment objectives and without needing to compromise on financial returns. Our role as an asset manager is to work with investors, developers, asset owners and regulators to provide investment solutions for private capital to invest in sustainable infrastructure, manage ESG risks and address the challenges of climate change.
Offshore Wind Project
Offshore Wind Farms have positive environmental impacts when compared to fossil fuels-based energy production. The example below outlines the considerations and highlights the difference between ESG risk management and tracking proactive sustainability outcomes in the context of the UN SDGs.
An analysis of ESG risks goes beyond what is immediately apparent. The project might be assessed as a Category B project under the Equator Principles but our review would address a wide range of considerations including (but not limited to):
- the contractors’ compliance with welfare, health and safety standards and other regulatory requirements
- the reputation of the parties involved, including financial and tax history
- the impact on the marine environment and any disruptions to migration pattern and aquatic habitats, which is typically captured in compliance with licenses and permits Direct engagement with borrowers as well as with technical, legal, financial and insurance consultants enables us as an asset manager to identify and appropriately mitigate a wide range of risks, including ESG risks, prior to investment.
Direct engagement with borrowers as well as with technical, legal, financial and insurance consultants enables us as an asset manager to identify and appropriately mitigate a wide range of risks, including ESG risks, prior to investment.
The GIG have indicated how an offshore wind project has the potential to contribute to the following SDGs: